Bookmarking

When bookmarking a journal article with multiple authors, we like to cut it down to 4 authors with an et al. When removing them one by one, it jumps back to the top of the page each time. Frustrating when you sometimes get over 30 authors. Is it p...

We are pleased to see the introduction of 4 additional resource types, however it would be great if the drop down list in the edit screen could be in alphabetical order please.

Currently, when one of our list owners bookmarks a resource from our library discovery platform (Ex Libris Primo VE) or from a publisher site, not all of the relevant fields are populated in the resource record in Talis Aspire. For example, when j...

Currently when bookmarking from a journal, Talis includes the ISSN data without a dash after the first four digits. Library catalogues, publishers and journal sites display an ISSN in the format of 1234-5678 (including the dash) whereas Talis is d...

We've noticed recently that publication dates which are preceded by a © symbol in bookmarks aren't recognised as dates when exporting from an Aspire list to a bibliography (bookmarking from OCLC WorldCat periodically gives rise to dates with © in ...

Some bookmark types (eg Book) have the option, when first bookmarking, to change the Author field from Dual Field to Single Field. For other bookmark types (eg Document), when first adding an Author field it can only be added as Dual Field; the op...

Book editors are sometimes entered as authors so it would be great if you could somehow switch them to the editor without deleting the author and re-entering the information into an editor field. this would save time if there were a lot of correct...

Currently, all possible 'Add field' options are able to added to the metadata window regardless of what resource type has been selected. To enhance the user experience, it would be helpful if only the fields necessary to reference the selected res...

Currently appropriate metadata fields and citiation styles cannot be selected eg. NZLSG As a workaround, we put whole Law citation into the Title field. It would be helpful if there was increased compatibility with Law resources.

Currently, 'Report' is not a resource type, and 'Report number' is not a metadata field. Adding these options would make metadata and references more accurate for Reports.